Friday, February 1, 2013

Maintaining Connection While Playing a Fish: Staying Connected In Relationships

"For it is important that awake people be awake, or a breaking line may discourage them back to sleep; the  signals we give-yes or no, or maybe-should be clear: the darkness around us is deep". William Stafford.


Every time I battle a big fish or watch someone else do battle, I am aware of the precarious position of the fly fisher. There is often a fine line between being able to net the fish and losing the fish. Too much tension and the fish breaks free. Not enough tension and the fish throw’s the hook.

I and other fly fishers often make a lot of mistakes while battling fish.

I think these fine lines that are often crossed, broken or maintained while battling fish, can parallel our dialogue in relationships with others.  In relationships, a certain kind of “tension” or “contact” must be maintained to keep the relationship and communication moving forward and growing. And here too indeed there are fine lines.  If we rush our words, ideas, and perspectives on others, or get angry, often the relationship stops growing and in a way, “breaks off”,. Or we are aloof and indifferent. with a shrug of the shoulders,  "A shrug that lets the fragile sequence break". All it takes is a subtle glance away or of disgust or disapproval or being overly forecful. The opportunity is lost.

But we can also do and say too little during times of potential relational growth. We can let go of all our own intentions and take little initiative and in a sense, betray ourselves for as the poet says, "There is many a betrayal in the mind".  Our own intentions and our words can sort of just drift away from us as we merely conform to the ideas of others. We break the tension by just going along.

Any meaningful relationship is a give and take and exchange of honest dialogue. This exchange is all  part of the delicate balance to maintain contact. As is true in the art of conversation and in much of fly fishing, timing is everything. There is a time to act and speak and there is a time to be still and listen. 

I know I let potential conversations die out. Sometimes it is easy for me to understand what went wrong just as it is easy to understand what happens when I put too much pressure on a fish or not maintain proper tension. Sometimes I get a feeling right in midst of the conversation, “No, don’t say that”, or “Not now” or “Just be quiet now”.  Or, sometimes I know that to simply ask a polite question rather than making another statement is just what is needed to maintain the tension. At other times, a strong statement may be needed. It depends. There is timing. There are fine lines, just as there are fine lines in maintaining a fish on the end of the line. And often I break those fine lines.

And when it comes to conversing with our loved ones; our family members, these can be the most precarious of all situations. To maintain contact in these situations can be touchy and requires patience and art.

Today, I took two friends fishing on Pueblos Arkansas River. As is often the case, fish were landed and fish were lost.  Fine lines were maintained and some fine lines were broken.

Hopefully, more importantly, the fine lines of our relationships were maintained.

8 comments:

  1. I think you so artfully captured a complex subject with your analogy. Relationships vary in depth and type; they do require finesse and nurturing. As you say timing is rather critical: when to invoke conversation and when to just listen; when to joke and when to be serious. And indeed, family relationships can be some of the most challenging because of the history that accompanies them. You stated it well they "can be touchy and requires patience and art."
    Ah, to understand how much pressure to apply vice maintaining proper tension - as you do with your fishing line...

    You've painted a nice visual with your words.
    Here's to maintaining the "fine lines".

    -L

    ReplyDelete
  2. In past posts I have often quoted from "A River Runs through It", where we see the challenging nature of family relationships. Norman in the end of his novel concludes, "It is those we love and should know who elude us". He also says of his brother, "He did not want any big brother advice,...In the end I could not help him". And if we are going to continue to apply the parallel to hooking a big fish, sometimes there is nothing you can do and the fish just freaks out and breaks free. Sometimes, in the end there is nothing we could have done differently.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The fish may "freak out" and break free, but sometimes it comes back again, no? It's nearby, but carefully, quietly observing - still interested, but cautious...unsure about taking another bite at the lure.

    Family ties are so complex. Sometimes disintegration of a relationship is permanent and at other times, maybe there is hope for restoration given time and patience or even an alternate approach. On some level I like to think the involved parties really do care, but there is too much emotional "junk" to wade through and they can't see a way out. Being an optimist, my tendency is to want improvement, want things to work out. Often I am in the position of mediator and not one directly involved. It is painful to watch loved ones struggle with sibling relations - reliving and reigniting "hot buttons". The challenge remains - how much advice to give? how to foster healing? when/how to help?
    In the end, maybe we can't do anything differently or maybe the opportunity has not yet presented itself.
    I have not read "A River Runs Through It" but will add it to my reading list.

    -L

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, the fish may bite again but it is wary. The fly fisher usually has to "rest" the fish. In the poem by W. Stafford from which I quote from for this piece the first lines are interesting. "If I don't know the kind of person you are and you don't know the kind of person that I am ..." So, I think we(and this is obvious)should know who we are speaking to and we should know ourselves. This way perhaps we are less likely to ignite those hot buttons you speak of. I think in life and relationships far too many things are assumed about others and that fact causes problems. Even here, maybe I have assumed too much.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You touch on two very important points. The first is "we should know ourselves". It occurred to me that we must first have a relationship with our self. If this is lacking, then the foundation from which we operate can be unstable. How can we possibly help others? The second is our assumptions. How easily they can lead as far astray. Many times I enter into a situation with pre-conceived notions and assumptions all prefaced on my own perspective and beliefs only to find out later they were incorrect in part or in total. Yes, assumptions can be disastrous; but how often do we check them before acting? Know thyself - not always easy ...

    -L

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree. Know thy self. Know the inner story/myth that one is living out or trying to live out. And yes, examine one's assumptions (for me they are judgements and often I am so wrong). At the same time there is "something" about just "leaping" with out checking. To simply act with out our reason and without doing all our homework and calculations. This seems to be true in matters of faith. Some believe that to believe and to have faith is not a rational deduction. It is a leap.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your comment made me recall Malcolm Gladwell's book "Blink". He posits that many good decisions are in fact made with the adaptive unconscious mind without all the myriad of information one normally associates with analytical, carefully evaluated decisions. Malcolm refers to this a "thin slicing". While not always perfect (and indeed he states there is room for fallibility), this thinking or rapid cognition happens in the blink of an eye and is often used for efficient human functioning. He states there are lots of situations, particularly in time of high pressure and stress, that leaping to decision, making snap judgments, and relying on first impressions offer a better method to understanding and making sense of things. So, yes there are times we don't always have time or the need to all "our homework".
    Perhaps that also holds true in matters of faith, for surely as you suggest, "faith is not a rational deduction" but rather a "leap".
    In contrast however, we may spend a lot of time (as opposed to the very short time frame of rapid cognition) pondering our faith, our beliefs - trying to ferret out truth and sometimes just WHAT to believe. I find myself in this camp more than not.
    Maybe I need lessons in leaping :-)

    -L

    ReplyDelete
  8. Robert Bly has written much on the "passive man" and no doubt this passivity effects our ability to have clarity and to make decisions. We/I often feel confused and kind of "stuck". I know as a child in some ways it was easier for me to have clarity on issues. I didn't think so much about why I was going to do something, ie fly fish; to want to do something was reason enough. I remember fly fishing felt like it was "my own"; I "recognized" it quite quickly as something I wanted to spend time doing.

    ReplyDelete